The Kilgannon Blog has moved! You can now access the blog from our website.
The new address is www.kilgannon.com/blog/
The Kilgannon Blog has moved! You can now access the blog from our website.
The new address is www.kilgannon.com/blog/
Filed under Uncategorized
By now we all realize that technology has taken over. Information can be obtained at the speed of 4G. Mobile devices with GPS can pinpoint our every step. Not sure about something? Find the answer with your smartphone in a snap. These are all very convenient tools, and we would be hard-pressed to think about life without them. They have given us the ability to do more, but at what intellectual price?
As producers, we are getting information out there faster than ever, but what is sacrificed is the ability to connect and communicate with others in a meaningful way. We keep hurling more fill dirt into an ever-widening void. We’re like gluttons feasting on so many empty calories. It’s commonplace now to visit the home pages of most major news sites and see numerous “articles” about how to lose weight or top ten lists of the best sitcoms of the ‘80s, all replete with typos and the occasional nonsensical phrase. It’s classified as content. But, where’s the value? Do we really need to know these things? I’ll admit I quite often click on these items, not because it betters me in any way, but because it’s easy. What’s the harm? I think to myself.
None, really – at least not to the consumer of this information. The harm comes to the producers. The speed at which all this data is generated leaves too many opportunities for errors. And those errors will slowly diminish the credibility of a company. Being up-to-the-second and fresh is one thing, but it shouldn’t be at the expense of the bigger picture–your brand.
Although we all feel the pressures of this digital age bearing down, it’s always a good idea to pause and take inventory of what we’re putting out there. Dig deeper, if necessary, to find at least a little piece of information that stands out and resonates with your audience–something that will stick to their proverbial ribs. The extra time will pay off in how your company is perceived and whether they come back for more.
– Kurt Miller, EVP, Executive Creative Director
It used to be that crisis communications managers had the power to “beat” the media cycle. They had a window of time, albeit small, to gather the crisis team in a war room and assess the situation in order to craft and refine key message points for reporters.
The proliferation of citizen journalism and social media has changed how crises are covered, yet a majority of companies have not updated their crisis communications plan to reflect new strategies and techniques. A recent study conducted by Gartner Communications revealed that 84.8 percent of companies worldwide have a general crisis communications plan; however, only 20.7 percent of them have a social media crisis plan.
Below are eight steps to remember when implementing a crisis communications plan in today’s environment:
Is your company prepared for a crisis played out in social media? To ensure an “issue” doesn’t escalate into a crisis, it is mandatory to monitor key social media outlets 24/7. There are several free tools available such as Google Alerts, Technorati, and Blogpulse. For companies with a budget for monitoring, check out BuzzLogic, Radian6, and Trackur.
– Debbie Dryden, VP, Thought Leadership
Filed under Social Media
When most marketers develop a communications plan, they start with their product or service, determining the target audience that represents the greatest revenue opportunity. Smart marketers dig deeper to identify target insights, high-opportunity vertical segments or underdeveloped regions.
But if you want your marketing to go a step further and truly engage with customers, you should establish rich connections based on where they are in the purchase cycle. This dimension is especially important if you are promoting a product with a long sales cycle, or a B2B brand.
For a prospect to consider selecting your brand, you must first establish a base level of knowledge and trust. One quarter of the U.S. respondents to Edelman’s 11th Annual Trust Barometer indicated that they needed to hear something about a company 6+ times before they believe it. Note that they said “hear,” not “be exposed to.” With advertising exposure exceeding 3,000 messages per day, it is critical that marketers connect with prospects, rather than simply shout at them.
To start creating a connection plan, consider how your brand relates to prospects in each of these stages:
Unaware and Unengaged: This is the largest, but also the most passive target group. They have unmet needs, but have yet to begin actively looking for a solution.
Increasingly Interested: This group has started to show interest in your category and may be attending trade shows, beginning to read relevant articles or looking for informational webinars.
Actively Searching: Prospects who are actively searching are driven by a pressing need. They are researching specific solutions and beginning to establish impressions of brands that best fit that need.
Confirming Credentials and Chemistry: This group is actively going through the RFP process (whether formal or not), narrowing their options and determining which brand has the right solution at the right price.
Establishing the Relationship: Communications shouldn’t stop when the sale is made. The value that current users place on the relationship will make or break both referrals and incremental sales.
By customizing the media and message to align with each of these stages in the purchase cycle, marketers will have the foundation for a powerful, multi-touchpoint connection plan.
- Pamela J. Alvord, EVP Managing Director of Strategy and Operations
Filed under advertising, Branding, Community, Compelling
We’re in the midst of some rather transformative times. Especially if you happen to live in the Middle East. Some are crediting Facebook and Twitter as key catalysts that helped to overthrow a 40-year dictatorship in Egypt. This phenomenon has spread throughout the Arab world from Yemen to Bahrain and is currently erupting in Libya. You can follow the revolution on Twitter.
And last year, we witnessed a revolution in Iran from our social media accounts. Marshall McLuhan believed that all media is transformative – that when you engage it, it changes you. Social media has indeed changed the flow of information to a more democratic forum – especially in more closed societies.
I believe that social media is having an effect on all our relationships. Will it ultimately change the world for the better? I hope so. But one thing I do know is I will not be watching CNN while it happens.
Tips for following events in social media:
Don’t assume that people who are not from your country spell the same way you do. Arabic words, especially, have many translations.
– Jimmy Gilmore, Senior Copywriter
Filed under Social Media
The digital press check can be markedly different than the traditional press check. In a majority of instances, you never have to leave your office. Here are some basic tips to follow to ensure that you’ll have a successful experience.
1) What You See Is What You Get – When you review a proof for a digital press job, you’ll be looking at an actual press sheet printed from the digital press. And this is a key difference between digital printing and traditional printing. The digital press gives the printer the capability of showing you exactly what you can expect on the actual paper you’ll be printing on. While some proofing systems can run on the actual paper and generally serve the same purpose, you would have to go on a press check to make sure you’re getting an accurate representation of your client’s material. With digital printing, you can check the sheet at your desk.
2) I Can See Clearly Now – Just like any traditional press check, you should carefully check for all the basics like type, color, clarity, crop marks, and any other potential problem areas. Since you’re checking an actual press sheet, use a set of the color printouts of the final file you sent to the printer – this will give you something to check against, just in case there was an issue with the file.
3) The Times They Are A-Changing – Digital printing is the perfect fit when you’re using variable data to reach your client’s prospects. Look at the position of the variable data to make sure it is consistent in placement. Ask your printer to bring you several different press sheets so you can see a variety of line lengths for the names, addresses, and any other area that changes. Remember to watch for type that might reflow in a paragraph due to length of the variable data.
4) Every Picture Tells a Story, Don’t It – When you have to “color match” a digitally printed piece that was previously printed on a traditional press, ask your printer to run some test sheets so you can see if you need to make any file adjustments. You may encounter this situation from time to time, so it is worth the minimal expense to maintain your client’s brand integrity.
– Tim Kedzierski, Production Manager
A big part of what makes the online arena attractive to marketers is the ability to engage customers and potential customers in a variety of ways. The most important “engagement” aspect, however, is a user’s experience with the site. If a site is cumbersome and not user-friendly, people aren’t going to spend a lot of time trying to navigate through what is fast becoming a bad experience for them.
Add to that the aspect of being asked to register, and most users will alter their behavior as a result. A recent study by Janrain in conjunction with Blue Research noted that:
The research indicates that “…consumers are frustrated with the traditional online registration process and will favor brands that make it easy for them to be recognized.…”
One method that surfaced as a solution to being recognized was being able to sign in using an existing social media log-in such as from Facebook, Google, Twitter, or LinkedIn. Two-thirds (66%) of consumers said that this would be an “attractive solution to the problem.” Of this 66%:
Making your site user-friendly goes a long way in your effort to keep customers engaged. Listen to what your customers tell you about your site. They spend the most time there. Make their time on your site beneficial for both them and you. Like most things in life, people use things that they are familiar with and make them the most comfortable. Sometimes that’s a website, and most times that’s your customer.
– Dave Capano, EVP, Director of Connection Planning
Filed under Online Store
Do you remember back in college when your Marketing 101 professor asked your class, “Who owns a brand?” Even though it was more than 20 years ago, I remember it like it was yesterday. And I remember my first thought – Proctor & Gamble, Unilever, Nabisco… they are the ones that own their brands. Boy did I feel stupid when someone in the class said “the customer.” Of course… the customer owns it. Why didn’t I think of that?
The customer owns your brand. So why is it that so many of us have forgotten it as we progress through our careers? How could Starbucks, GAP and Tropicana, three extremely successful brands with smart leadership, possibly launch new branding efforts that incensed their customer bases if they were paying attention to customer needs and desires? You would think companies like this would be very careful when launching new products, new campaigns or rebranding efforts. Having the knowledge that brings a company closer to the true feelings of its target seems invaluable, but many companies are either going about it the wrong way or skipping it altogether.
Starbucks – Even though they did pretesting with consumers, ever since Starbucks recently announced that they were
dropping the words “Starbucks Coffee” from their logo, the social media space has been on fire with dissent. Sure… Starbucks needed the “freedom and flexibility to think beyond coffee,” but they could have gone about it in a much different way (like by just removing the word “coffee”!).
Starbucks’ blog page is loaded with negative comments. Their Facebook page has thousands of negative posts about the logo. And there are at least 50 new Facebook pages dedicated to bringing back the old logo! And a lot of the feedback is coming from their most loyal customers.
Loyal customers have come out and said that they have “no relationship with the mermaid.” A recent survey by ZURB found that 72 percent of consumers actually “hate” the new logo. And experts have said that dropping the Starbucks name from the logo will confuse consumers who are not as familiar with the company.
Starbucks appears to be much better known by their name and green font, and not by the Siren. Right now they are standing firm and holding their position. Time will tell if it was a smart decision.
GAP – In an incident from last year, Gap changed their design from the classic, blue-and-white lettering to one thatsported a simpler Helvetica font. Outraged consumers ignited a social media storm. Gap responded by crowd-sourcing the design, and then they ultimately pulled the plug on the experiment and reverted back to the old logo. The bad – they didn’t talk to consumers ahead of time and got caught in a massive storm of negative publicity. The good – they quickly listened to the negative response from their customers and took action.
Tropicana – Customers were irate when Pepsi changed the packaging for this brand. They complained through letters, e-mails, telephone calls and social media posts. They said the new packaging resembled “a generic bargain brand” or “store brand,” and made it harder to distinguish among the varieties of Tropicana or differentiate Tropicana from other orange juices. Pepsi bowed to public demand and is going back to the old packaging and brand symbol (the orange with the protruding straw).
They admitted to underestimating the deep emotional bond that customers had with the original packaging. And they plan on contacting everyone who called or wrote them, to explain that they are changing things back.
There will always be backlash when companies try to change something. That is human nature. But the backlash in all three of these instances was extremely strong and volatile. It makes you really wonder what kind of upfront research was conducted.
There are lots of additional examples – Andersen Consulting creating Accenture, Comcast creating Xfinity, and RadioShack trying to become The Shack. Who can forget New Coke (customers loved the taste of New Coke – the problem here was that they never told focus group participants that they were taking classic Coke away!). All of these have met with more than their fair share of criticism from current and potential customers, and caused damage to their brand.
You must listen to and engage with your customers. Customers need to feel as if they own your brand. With today’s technology and social media explosion, it is easier to do than ever before. Customers can now critique, talk back and connect with each other, and share stories and opinions. Your brand has to be committed to listening to these discussions and engaging appropriately and transparently. This doesn’t mean that the old forms of listening have gone away. Direct discussions, interviews, surveys, focus groups, observation, warranty data, field reports – they are all still critical aspects of finding the voice of your customer.
Once you have the voice of your customer, make sure it spans your entire organization and influences all types of decisions… not just marketing ones. It can help improve processes, service and products. And by all means, please don’t let your brand become the next case study in what not to do!
– Stephen Weinstein, EVP Director of Account Management
Filed under advertising, Branding, Strategy